United States v. Paul
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge BAKER
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Airman Charles W. Paul was convicted by a military judge, contrary to his plea, of one specification of using ecstasy in violation of Article 112a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 912a (2012). 1 The adjudged and approved sentence included a bad-conduct discharge, five months of confinement, and reduction to E-l. Appellant argued before the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction on the ecstasy charge. The CCA affirmed, holding that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Heller v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Garner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. BeattyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. PeaseCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. CadeArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
- United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
- United States v. Master Sergeant TIMOTHY B. HENNISArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.