Legal Opinion

United States v. Hill

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided November 30, 1993No. NMCM 92 1722PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOLLISON, Senior Judge:

The principal issue in this appeal from a special court-martial conviction for wrongful use of marijuana is whether the Government proved that the positive urinalysis results upon which the conviction was based applied to a urine specimen submitted by the appellant. We conclude that the Government failed in its proof and reverse.

The appellant was tried by special court-martial. Contrary to his pleas, officer members found the appellant guilty of wrongful use of marijuana in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 912a. The members…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. HarperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. WeissUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. GrafUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. MitchellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. ReedNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  2. United States v. MarkertNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  3. United States v. Specialist GLENN M. BRADLEYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  4. United States v. OatneyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API