Legal Opinion
Snyder v. Seldin
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 2, 2004No. AC 23165PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
In this negligence action, the plaintiff, Jennifer Snyder, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants Barbara Seldin and Lawrence Seldin.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the defendant’s motion should not have been granted because the court improperly determined that New York workers’ compensation law was applicable to the *720claim. We disagree with the plaintiff and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts were stipulated to by the parties and are relevant to our disposition…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Farrell v. FarrellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Doucette v. PomesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Simaitis v. FloodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jaiguay v. VasquezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Ace Equipment Sales, Inc. v. H.O. Penn MacHinery Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Hodgate v. FerraroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Willis v. Firestone Building Products Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005