Willis v. Firestone Building Products Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO INTERVENE [DOC. #15]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
In his complaint, plaintiff David Willis alleges he is a truck driver for Melton Truck Lines, Inc., (“Melton”) and that in the course of his employment he was injured due to defendant’s negligence. Employer Melton now moves to intervene as a plaintiff as a matter of right under Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a), or, in the alternative, permissively under Fed. R.Civ.P. 24(b), on the grounds that it paid Willis benefits under the Oklahoma Worker’s Compensation Act related to the injuries claimed in this case, and is entitled to a portion of any…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Restor-A-Dent Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. Certified Alloy Products, Inc., Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Intervener-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Reich v. ABC/York-Estes Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Peoples Benefit Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Bay Casino, LLC v. M/V Royal EmpressDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.