Legal Opinion

Laganas v. Installation Specialties, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1972No. 6113PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge:

Appellant contracted with appellee for furnishing and installation of carpeting and Venetian blinds in several buildings. A dispute developed as to whethér a basement area was included within the contract price. After receiving partial payment appellee brought suit and obtained judgment for the balance due on a promissory note and for an additional sum representing work not covered by the note. ' Appellant’s answer admitted execution of the note but asserted failure of consideration in that appellee failed to render complete performance.

Unknown to both attorneys until…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Haller Wall Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1909
  2. Ansberry v. HarrahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
  3. Barrett v. Air Brakes & Controls, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Conover v. HalleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Curtis Builders, Inc. v. General Floor Service Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Town Center Management Corp. v. ChavezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Pierola v. MoschonasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Weinstein v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Flagel v. Southwest Clinical Physiatrists, P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. Stinson v. MuellerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API