Legal Opinion

Curtis Builders, Inc. v. General Floor Service Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 1954No. 1519PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

A subcontractor sued a contractor for extras furnished on two construction projects, herein referred to as the Bell School job and the Fort Belvoir job. The trial court found for. plaintiff, and defendant contractor brings this appeal.

One. of the errors assigned is that the trial court should have found that there had been an accord and satisfaction. The evidence revealed a dispute between the parties as to whether parts of" the work done on both jobs by plaintiff was extra work, and that after some negotiation plaintiff offered to settle the controversy as to both jobs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Haller Wall Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1909
  2. Conover v. HalleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. H. H. Butler Stores, Inc. v. BarronDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Minmar Builders, Inc. v. Beltway Excavators, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Voight & McMakin Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Property Redevelopment Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Barrett v. Air Brakes & Controls, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Laganas v. Installation Specialties, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Double H Housing Corp. v. DavidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API