Flagel v. Southwest Clinical Physiatrists, P.C.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Judge.
Our primary consideration is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment based on its conclusion that the payment by defendant-appellee, Southwest Clinical Physiatrists, P.C. (“Southwest”), by check, with “Paid in Full” noted on its face, to plaintiff-appellant, Donald Flagel (“Flagel”), of the undisputed part of Fla-gel’s disputed claim constituted an accord and satisfaction of Flagel’s whole claim. First, however, we consider whether the trial court erred in denying Flagel a change of judge based on waiver. Finally, we consider whether the trial court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Air Van Lines, Inc. v. BusterAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- County Fire Door Corp. v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Visco v. Universal Refuse Removal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Board of EqualizationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- King v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR COUNTY OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Estate Landscape & Snow Removal Specialists, Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Acierno v. Worthy Bros. Pipeline Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Max of Switzerland, Inc. v. Allright Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Juvenile in Mohave County Juvenile Court v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Adrian S. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.