Legal Opinion

Flagel v. Southwest Clinical Physiatrists, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 31, 1988No. 1 CA-CIV 9377PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

Our primary consideration is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment based on its conclusion that the payment by defendant-appellee, Southwest Clinical Physiatrists, P.C. (“Southwest”), by check, with “Paid in Full” noted on its face, to plaintiff-appellant, Donald Flagel (“Flagel”), of the undisputed part of Fla-gel’s disputed claim constituted an accord and satisfaction of Flagel’s whole claim. First, however, we consider whether the trial court erred in denying Flagel a change of judge based on waiver. Finally, we consider whether the trial court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Air Van Lines, Inc. v. BusterAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. County Fire Door Corp. v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Visco v. Universal Refuse Removal CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Board of EqualizationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. King v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR COUNTY OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate Landscape & Snow Removal Specialists, Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Acierno v. Worthy Bros. Pipeline Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  3. Max of Switzerland, Inc. v. Allright Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Juvenile in Mohave County Juvenile Court v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Adrian S. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API