Legal Opinion
York Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 5, 1945No. 45282PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge
The plaintiff, a partnership, entered into a contract in August of 1935 to build for the United States Lock and Dam No. 9 in the Allegheny Kiver in Pennsylvania. The work was done in the autumn of 1935, and in the open seasons of 1936, 1937, and 1938. It was completed on or about October 6, 1938. The plaintiff was paid the agreed *647price for the work. It sues here for damages for several alleged breaches of contract by the United States. It sets forth in its petition sixteen separate causes of action. All but 4 of them are for damages which, the plaintiff asserts, resulted from one breach of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Standard Rice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Beuttas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
- Young-Fehlhaber Pile Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
- United States v. Standard Rice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lesh v. Trustees of Purdue UniversityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
- Shedd-Bartush Foods of Illinois, Inc. v. Commodity Credit Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955
- Fort Sill Gardens, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Fort Sill Gardens, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Fort Sill Gardens, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966