Legal Opinion

Fort Sill Gardens, Inc. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 21, 1966No. 187-63Published

1Opinion of the Court

355 F.2d 636

FORT SILL GARDENS, INC.

v.

The UNITED STATES.

No. 187-63.

United States Court of Claims.

January 21, 1966.

Carl L. Shipley, Washington, D. C., attorney of record, for plaintiff. Shipley, Akerman & Pickett, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Edwin J. Reis, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. John W. Douglas, for defendant.

Before COWEN, Chief Judge, and LARAMORE, DURFEE, DAVIS and COLLINS, Judges.

DURFEE, Judge.

1

The present motions were submitted without oral argument to the court for its decision. Plaintiff is an Oklahoma corporation organized with an FHA form charter and by-laws…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Harvey Ward Locke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  3. Ray B. Woodbury v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Chain Belt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. United States v. BeuttasSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API