Herzog v. Campbell
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error, from, the district court of Clay county. Tried below before Hastings, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
Tbe assignments of error in this case demand no protracted discussion. The first one urged in the-brief is that “tbe court erred in giving instructions-of tbe plaintiff as requested, instructions not being numbered, more than one instruction being given upon tbe same sheet without number, and further giving tbe instructions as requested by tbe plaintiff citing authorities in tbe instructions.” From tbe argument' it would seem that: tbe assignment is merely directed to tbe formal matters referred to; that is, to tbe failure to separately number tbe instructions and to tbe citation,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sioux City & Pacific Railroad v. FinlaysonNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Boldt v. BudwigNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- City of Chadron v. GloverNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Omaha & Florence Land & Trust Co. v. HansenNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Jolly v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hutchens v. KukerNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Rimmer v. Chadron Printing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1953
- Bailey v. KlingNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Cline v. HoldregeNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Farley v. Fidelity Rent & Collection Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926