Legal Opinion

Farley v. Fidelity Rent & Collection Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1926No. 19614. Department TwoPublished

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

The complaint charges that the appellant was acting as the respondent’s agent in caring for certain properties, collection of rents therefrom and making disbursements.in relation thereto, and that there was due and owing to the respondent, on account of rent and moneys collected as her agent, over and above the commission to which the appellant was entitled, the sum of $258.88, that demand had been made for that amount, but that the appellant had neglected and refused to pay it, and concluded with a prayer for judgment in that amount.

The appellant’s answer admitted that it was acting as agent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SageIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Herzog v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API