Legal Opinion
Jack C. Smith v. Anthony M. Frank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1991No. 89-16723PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, District Judge:
Plaintiff appeals the judgment in favor of defendant Postmaster General in his handicap discrimination action against the United States Postal Service brought under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701, et seq. We hold that the district court erred in refusing to accept plaintiff’s timely filed but lengthy objections to the magistrate’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and in denying the plaintiff a reasonable opportunity to conform his objections to the local rules, and remand this claim to the district court for action not inconsistent with this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Tommy v. Greenhow v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Raul Loya v. Desert Sands Unified School District, a Governmental Agency & Harold SchoenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- McCall v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Joseph Raymond Cintron v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Schmidt v. JohnstoneDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- David Brengettcy v. William Horton, John Daley, Officer Farrow, John Does I-X, and the County of Cook, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Francisco Lucas Rodriguez-Roman v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Mahoney v. MahoneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.