Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Johnstone
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 18, 2003No. CV-02-0349-PHX-TATPublishedCited by 630 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TEILBORG, District Judge.
Pending before this Court is the Report and Recommendation (R & R) by Magistrate Judge Lawrence Anderson entered on March 10, 2003 (Doc. # 28). In the R & R, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court deny Petitioner Diellind Schmidt’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. #1).
In the R & R recommending that the Petition be denied, the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that (1) they had ten days to file specific written objections to the R & R and (2) the failure to timely file objections to any of the Magistrate Judge’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by630 opinions
- United States v. Mark Lamond WillisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Hampton v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2018
- Barten v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014
- Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- Carrillo-Lozano v. StolcDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
625 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.