Legal Opinion
Tommy v. Greenhow v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 5, 1988No. 87-2587PublishedCited by 117 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:
We consider two principal issues in this appeal: first, the extent to which, in matters submitted to a magistrate, a litigant’s failure to present his contentions either to the magistrate or the district court will bar him from raising those contentions on appeal; and second, whether the conclusion of the Secretary of Health and Human Services that appellant was an employee within the meaning of Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433, is supported by substantial evidence.
Facts
Appellant Tommy V. Greenhow received retirement insurance benefits under…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Edward Lester Schronce, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Ennis Nettles v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Williams v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Schmidt v. JohnstoneDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Ray MARSHALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.