United States v. Luna-Acosta
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Chief Judge.
Adrian Luna-Acosta appeals the district court’s written judgment imposing a sentence of thirty-three months’ imprisonment, filed five months after the district court had orally announced a sentence of twelve months’ imprisonment. Luna-Acosta argues that the district court lacked jurisdiction under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) to modify his twelve-month sentence. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we reverse and remand with instructions to vacate the thirty-three month sentence and file a written judgment consistent with the orally announced sentence of twelve months. 1
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. GanttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. LonjoseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sandusky v. GoetzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. MarquezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Ramon OchoaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- State v. RossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.