Legal Opinion

United States v. Luna-Acosta

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 3, 2013No. 12-2089PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Chief Judge.

Adrian Luna-Acosta appeals the district court’s written judgment imposing a sentence of thirty-three months’ imprisonment, filed five months after the district court had orally announced a sentence of twelve months’ imprisonment. Luna-Acosta argues that the district court lacked jurisdiction under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) to modify his twelve-month sentence. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we reverse and remand with instructions to vacate the thirty-three month sentence and file a written judgment consistent with the orally announced sentence of twelve months. 1

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. GanttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. LonjoseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sandusky v. GoetzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. MarquezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Ramon OchoaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. State v. RossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API