Legal Opinion
United States v. Baker
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 28, 2014No. 13-1042PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Rule 35(b), Fed.R.Crim.P., authorizes the district court, ujjon the Government’s motion, to reduce a previously imposed sentence if the defendant, after sentencing, provided substantial assistance to the Government in investigating or prosecuting another person. Generally the Government must file a motion for a sentence reduction within the year following sentencing. But Rule 35(b)(2)(B) permits the Government to file a motion more than one year after the court sentenced the defendant if his “substantial assistance involved ... information provided ... to the government…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. MannieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. SpauldingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. LanghamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.