United States v. Ramon Ochoa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Dissent by Chief District Judge NAVARRO.
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Ramon Ochoa (Ochoa) challenges the two-year sentence imposed following violations of his supervised release conditions. Ochoa specifically contends that the district court erred in increasing his sentence to the two-year statutory maximum based on Ochoa’s apparently disrespectful conduct after the district. court imposed a sentence of twelve months and a day. Ochoa maintains that the district court lacked jurisdiction to increase *455an already imposed sentence.1 We do not agree.
I.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Norma Burgos-AndjarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Todd PennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. MezaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Luna-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Jose Gerezano-RosalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- United States v. Gilbert MelvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- United States v. Arelvy CereceresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019