Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramon Ochoa

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 22, 2015No. 14-10124PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Dissent by Chief District Judge NAVARRO.

OPINION

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Ramon Ochoa (Ochoa) challenges the two-year sentence imposed following violations of his supervised release conditions. Ochoa specifically contends that the district court erred in increasing his sentence to the two-year statutory maximum based on Ochoa’s apparently disrespectful conduct after the district. court imposed a sentence of twelve months and a day. Ochoa maintains that the district court lacked jurisdiction to increase *455an already imposed sentence.1 We do not agree.

I.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Norma Burgos-AndjarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Todd PennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. MezaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Luna-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Jose Gerezano-RosalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. United States v. Gilbert MelvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  3. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  4. United States v. Arelvy CereceresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API