Legal Opinion

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 20, 1971No. C.D. 4257Published

1Opinion of the Court

Rosenstein, Judge:

The merchandise involved in the sis consolidated protests herein consists of uncleaned tree seeds, cone particles and stem ends stipulated to be “similar in all material respects to the uncleaned tree seeds” 1 in United States v. Border Brokerage Co., 54 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 905 (1967), which record is incorporated herein and upon which the case was submitted.

The importations were assessed for duty under paragraph 764, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 55816, as “Other garden and field seeds: * * * Tree and shrub”, at the rate of 1% cents per pound. Plaintiff, relying upon…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. United States v. Ranlett & StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Consolidated Elevator Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  4. United States v. Myers & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  5. United States v. AmendolaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API