Legal Opinion

Lenhart v. City of Hoquiam

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1915No. 12691PublishedCited by 7 opinions

' Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Sheeks, J., entered September 16, 1914, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action for breach of contract and for damages.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

The trial court sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint in this action. The plaintiff elected to stand upon the -allegations of the complaint, and the action was dismissed. This appeal followed.

The complaint states two causes of action. The first cause of action is to the effect that in June, 1910, the plaintiff leased to the defendant city a certain tract of land for a *169period of one year from the first day of July, 1910; that the defendant entered upon the land in pursuance of the lease and used the land as a garbage dump until the first day of July, 1911; that, as a part…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Collins v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Ransom v. City of South BendWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. International Contract Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. International Contract Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Byram v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Howe v. Whitman CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Puget Construction Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Mason v. YearwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Johnson v. Town of EndicottWashington Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API