Legal Opinion

Ransom v. City of South Bend

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1913No. 11287PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Rice, J., entered April 9, 1913, upon the pleadings and plaintiff’s opening statement, dismissing an action for personal injuries sustained in a fall upon a sidewalk.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall upon a sidewalk upon one of the streets of the defendant, a city of the third class. She alleges that she sustained the injury in consequence of *397the defendant’s negligence in this: that it permitted an obstruction, consisting of a timber two inches by four inches and about six feet in length, nailed diagonally to the sidewalk, to remain upon the walk for more than a week prior to the date of her injury, without having provided a barrier, light, or other warning to indicate the presence of the danger. She…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Winter v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. State v. CareyWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Touhey v. City of DecaturIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Born v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Walden v. . City of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Randolph v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  2. Cook v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hurley v. Town of BinghamUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  4. City of Birmingham v. WestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Jorguson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API