Legal Opinion
S.W. v. Spring Lake Park School District No. 16
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 4, 1999No. C9-98-1912PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s rejection of its motion for summary judgment on the ground it is entitled to vicarious official immunity. Because appellant is not entitled to share in the immunity granted to its employees, we affirm. We also grant respondents’ motion to strike a portion of appellant’s reply brief.
FACTS
This personal injury action was brought on behalf of A.M.W. by respondents, A.M.W.’s parents, against appellant Spring Lake Park School District No. 16. Respondents allege that a December 1, 1994, rape of A.M.W. occurred as a result of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anderson v. Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Douglas Duane Bahl v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Sletten v. Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- S.W. v. Spring Lake Park School District No. 16Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Meier v. City of Columbia HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.