Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 6, 2004No. CO-02-1125PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

Respondent Edward Anderson (hereinafter “respondent”), individually and in his capacity as guardian for his son, Trevor Anderson, sued appellants Paul Peterson and Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11 (the “district”) because of injuries Trevor incurred from an accident in a high school wood shop class taught by Peterson. The district court denied the district’s and Peterson’s summary judgment motions based on claims of statutory, official and vicarious official immunity and was affirmed by the court of appeals. We conclude that Peterson is protected by…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Johnson v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of Golden ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Gordon v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Mumm v. MornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Sok Kong v. City of BurnsvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API