Anderson v. Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
Respondent Edward Anderson (hereinafter “respondent”), individually and in his capacity as guardian for his son, Trevor Anderson, sued appellants Paul Peterson and Anoka Hennepin Independent School District 11 (the “district”) because of injuries Trevor incurred from an accident in a high school wood shop class taught by Peterson. The district court denied the district’s and Peterson’s summary judgment motions based on claims of statutory, official and vicarious official immunity and was affirmed by the court of appeals. We conclude that Peterson is protected by…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Johnson v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Nusbaum v. County of Blue EarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Brown v. City of Golden ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Gordon v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Mumm v. MornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Sok Kong v. City of BurnsvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.