Christensen v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINFREE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Four years after a couple purchased a new car, it collided with two moose on the Parks Highway. The couple sued the car dealership for product liability, alleging that the car's seat belt failed to restrain the driver in the accident. The superior court granted summary judgment to the dealership, concluding that "no reasonable jury could find that the Plaintiffs have proven that the seat belt ... was defective." The couple appeals;, arguing that the superior court applied an incorrect summary judgment standard and that genuine issues of material fact…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dairy Stores, Inc. v. Sentinel Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- State, Department of Highways v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Richardson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Hagen v. StrobelAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Wright v. AndingAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Hahn v. GEICO Choice Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.