Legal Opinion
Riedell v. Stuart
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 21, 1931No. 20083PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMeNEILL, J.
This is an appeal from the district court of Oklahoma county, and the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, Chas. M. Riedell, plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, and R. T. Stuart and A. L. Welch, defendants in error, as defendants.
Plaintiff commenced this action in said court on the 17th of November, 1926, and in his petition alleged, in substance, that he was an expert accountant, engaged in the business of preparing United States income tax reports for individuals, firms, and corporations, generally preparing and prosecuting before the Income Tax Division of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Taylor v. Davis' AdministratrixSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Schumann-Heink v. FolsomIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
- Robertson v. BullionsNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- Hall v. JamesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Bradner Smith & Co. v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sherr v. WinklerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Samson Resources Co. v. SemCrude, L.P. (In re SemCrude, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Mertz v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- 7 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1031, 1979 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 23,306 W. P. Moore, Virgil A. Hundtofte and Life Science Products Company, a Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Sherr v. WinklerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.