Legal Opinion
Michigan State A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Johnson
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 22, 2016No. Case No. 16-cv-11844PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Amended Opinion and Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction [4]
HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN, United States District Court Judge
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs Mary Lansdown, Erin Comar-tin, Dion Williams, and the Michigan State A. Philip Randolph Institute (“Plaintiffs”) commenced this action against the Michigan Secretary of State, Ruth Johnson (“Defendant”) on May 24, 2016.1 See Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiffs allege that the passage of Public Act 268 (“P.A. 268”) impermissibly burdens the right to vote under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Michigan State A. Philip Randolph Institute v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- One Wisconsin Institute, Inc. v. ThomsenDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2016
- Mich. State A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Democratic National Committee v. Bostelmann, MargeDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020
- Heindel v. AndinoDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.