Legal Opinion

Michigan State A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 17, 2016No. 16-2071/2115PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which GILMAN and STRANCH, JJ., joined. GILMAN, J. (pp. 669-71), delivered a separate concurring opinion.

OPINION

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Ruth Johnson, Michigan’s Secretary of State (the “Secretary”), moves for a stay pending appeal of the district court’s July 22, 2016 and August 1, 2016 orders granting the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. The district court’s preliminary injunction prohibits the Secretary from enforcing Public Act 268 (“PA 268”), a law that eliminates straight-party voting in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Anthony Daunt v. Jocelyn BensonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. Tommy Ray Mays, II v. Frank LaRoseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. Reform America v. City of Detroit, Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  4. Luke Waid v. Darnell EarleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. Eugene Mazo v. New Jersey Secty StateCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API