Legal Opinion
Heindel v. Andino
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided February 8, 2019No. Civil Action No.: 3:18-cv-01887-JMCPublished
1Opinion of the Court
J. Michelle Childs, United States District Judge
Before the court for review is a Motion *344for Summary Judgment1 (ECF No. 5) by Defendants Marci Andino, Executive Director of the South Carolina State Election Commission ("SCSEC"); Billy Way, Jr., Chair of the SCSEC; and Mark A. Benson, Marilyn Bowers, and Nicole Spain Wright, Members of the SCSEC (collectively "Defendants" or "SCSEC"). Defendants move the court to dismiss Plaintiffs Frank Heindel and Phil Leventis' (collectively "Plaintiffs") declaratory judgment action for lack of standing. For the reasons that follow, the court GRANTS…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.