Legal Opinion

Desimone v. Barrows

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided June 7, 2007No. C.A. 2210-VCSPublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STRINE, Vice Chancellor.

I. Introduction

The nominal defendant in this derivative action, Sycamore Networks, Inc., is one of the many corporations drawing adverse attention regarding the methods by which it granted stock options to its officers, employees, and directors. Last year, the Securities and Exchange Commission and United States Department of Justice launched investigations into Sycamore’s stock options practices on the suspicion that Sycamore had misrepresented — by backdating — certain options grants and engaged in related misbehavior.

Armed with the fact of the government…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. United States v. O'HaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Central Mortgage Co. v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  2. In Re Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
  3. F5 Capital v. PappasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. Wood v. BaumSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  5. Ryan v. GiffordCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API