Legal Opinion

Otterbeck v. Lamb

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1969No. 5679PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Collins, C. J.:

This appeal is from a final judgment and an order denying appellant a new trial in a personal injury action arising out of a two-car collision. The jury found for respondent (defendant below),.driver of one vehicle, and against appellant (plaintiff below), a passenger in the other vehicle. We think prejudicial error was committed in instructing the jury, reverse the order ■and remand the action for a new trial.

Appellant, Mrs. Dickinson, and their husbands were vacationing at Elk Point, Lake Tahoe, Nevada, and had for several years past. All four were deaf…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Shoshone Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. DolinskiNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Robinson v. CableCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Pobor v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ginnis v. Mapes Hotel CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Yamaha Motor Co., U.S.A. v. ArnoultNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Carson Ready Mix, Inc. v. First National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Nehls v. LeonardNevada Supreme Court · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API