Legal Opinion
Triple D & E, Inc. v. Van Buren
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 1972PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph Life, J.
These are two actions which Mr. Justice Joseph A. Suozzi in an order made July 18, 1972 directed to be tried jointly for the reason that they involved “ substantially the same issues of law and fact.” After an extended trial nothing was presented to alter that conclusion. In denying the application of plaintiff in each case for a preliminary injunction, Mr. Justice Suozzi said: ‘ ‘ There is a factual dispute with respect to the agreement containing the restrictive covenant. Moreover, it appears to this Court that plaintiff is merely a lessor of equipment and supplier of goods. There is little…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- M. O'Neil Supply Co. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Campbell Soup Co. v. LojeskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Walker Memorial Baptist Church, Inc. v. SaundersNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Super Maid Cook-Ware Corporation v. HamilCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Big Top Stores, Inc. v. Ardsley Toy Shoppe, Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Estate of FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Optivision, Inc. v. Syracuse Shopping Center AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1979
- Arlinghaus v. RitenourCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Zellner v. Stephen D. Conrad, M.D., P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.