Legal Opinion

Arneson v. Fox

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1980No. L.A. 31259PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

What are the administrative consequences to a real estate licensee who is convicted of a felony following his plea of nolo contendere? We will conclude that a conviction following such a plea may serve as the basis for administrative discipline, so long as the underlying offense bears a substantial relationship to the qualifications, functions or duties of the licensed business or profession.

Appellant Richard Wendell Arneson, Jr., is licensed by the California Department of Real Estate as a real estate broker. Except for the single conviction under scrutiny here, he has…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Lott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Perrine v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Newland v. Board of GovernorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Opdyk v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Kennick v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Stickel v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Maysonet v. GrandaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API