Legal Opinion

State v. Greer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.

Under the evidence in this case, was it the duty of the trial judge, without special request therefor, to instruct the jury upon the law of self-defense? We answer in the affirmative. C. S., 564; S. v. Thornton, 211 N. C., 413, 190 S. E., 758; S. v. Bost, 192 N. C., 1, 133 S. E., 176; S. v. Godwin, 211 N. C., 419, 190 S. E., 761.

The evidence was, of course, contradictory. But with this fact neither the trial court nor this Court has any concern in applying the principles of law involved. Indeed, upon appropriate instruction, the jury may have found the testimony relied upon by the State less…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. State v. . FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. State v. . ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. State v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. GinnUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  2. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. HippSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API