Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1978No. 786SC79PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

The defendant’s sole assignment of error is directed to the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on the law of self-defense. In support of this assignment, the defendant argues that his evidence tended to show self-defense as a matter of law. We do not agree.

The defendant refers us, inter alia, to State v. Hickman, 21 N.C. App. 421, 204 S.E. 2d 718 (1974) and State v. Evans, 19 N.C. App. 731, 200 S.E. 2d 213 (1973). He contends that the holdings in those cases are controlling here and, based upon the evidence presented, required the trial court to give an instruction on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. McCraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API