Toomey v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
Vincent Toomey appeals his conviction for robbery1 on the ground that the superi- or court erroneously instructed the jury on the issue of self-defense.
The facts in this ease were contested at trial. For purposes of review, we examine Toomey’s version of the events in order to determine whether an issue of self-defense was presented.
On February 14, 1976, Toomey and two friend's went to a bar and restaurant in Fairbanks known as the Sunset Strip. Too-mey estimated that he consumed between two “six-packs” and a case of beer. His friends became involved in an affray…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gray v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. MillettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- Albert B. Brooke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. BrowersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Snyder v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Weston v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Paul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
- Folger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
- Howard v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.