Legal Opinion

Toomey v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1978No. 3088PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

Vincent Toomey appeals his conviction for robbery1 on the ground that the superi- or court erroneously instructed the jury on the issue of self-defense.

The facts in this ease were contested at trial. For purposes of review, we examine Toomey’s version of the events in order to determine whether an issue of self-defense was presented.

On February 14, 1976, Toomey and two friend's went to a bar and restaurant in Fairbanks known as the Sunset Strip. Too-mey estimated that he consumed between two “six-packs” and a case of beer. His friends became involved in an affray…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. MillettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  3. Albert B. Brooke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. State v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. BrowersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Snyder v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Weston v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Paul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  4. Folger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  5. Howard v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API