Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mills v. Reynolds

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1991No. 89-193, 89-195Published

1DissentUrbigkit, Chief Justice

Are workers in Wyoming to be essentially unprotected from injurious acts which are culpably, willfully or criminally inflicted against them by co-workers by the barrier which has been applied legislatively to deny to them rights for civil justice to properly recover for resulting personal injury? Believing that the Wyoming Constitution says what it says and means what it was intended to provide in protection for citizens against a statist government, I respectfully dissent.

I

UNSAFE WORK PLACE — RIGHT TO INJURE OR KILL

These cases come to this court to present a constitutional challenge to a…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Poindexter v. GreenhowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  5. Saylor v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API