Legal Opinion

State v. Dilallo

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 2020No. S067493PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

340 Argued and submitted August 18, decision of Court of Appeals and judgment of circuit court affirmed December 24, 2020 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. MICHAEL JAMES DILALLO, Petitioner on Review. (CC 17CR81038) (CA A168222) (SC S067493)

478 P3d 509

At defendant’s trial, the jury was instructed that it could return nonunani- mous guilty verdicts. Defendant did not object. The jury found defendant guilty, and the trial court did not poll the jury. The Court of Appeals affirmed defen- dant’s conviction. Held: Because the jury was not polled, it is not appropriate to conduct plain…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. Chorney-PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Mandell v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. HooperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. ThornsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API