Legal Opinion

State v. Faunce

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 5, 2012No. 04CR0818; A143601PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Defendant was charged with and convicted of one count of murder with a firearm, ORS 163.115, and one count of felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270. On appeal, defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment with prejudice, arguing that the state violated his due process rights by failing to preserve exculpatory evidence. Defendant also assigns as error the trial court’s exclusion of defendant’s evidence, offered at trial to call into question the adequacy of the state’s investigation of the murder, as irrelevant. For the reasons explained…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BrayOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Warren v. ImperiaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. DikeosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API