Legal Opinion

State v. Bray

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 2018No. CC 11FE1078; SC S064843 (Control, S064846))PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this case, the SCA makes internet information confidential and does not permit Google to disclose it to district attorneys on request. Issuance of process, such as a subpoena, search warrant, or SCA order, is required.9 Therefore, in this case, ORS 135.815(1)(a) did not require the state to obtain, or the trial court to order the state to obtain, J's internet searches.

Defendant's next argument is that, even if ORS 138.815(1)(a) did not require that assistance, due process did. Due process undoubtedly requires the government to turn over evidence in its possession that is both favorable to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SassariniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. MAT, Inc. v. American Tower Asset Sub, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. AlmahmoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. State v. DikeosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API