Anti-Kalsomine Co. v. Kent Circuit Judge
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus by the Anti-Kalsomine Company to compel Allen C. Adsit, circuit judge of Kent county, to vacate an order requiring relator to produce certain records and correspondence for inspection.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an application for man-*251damns to require the respondent to vacate an order directing the relator to produce for inspection of its adversary in a pending suit its books and correspondence for a certain period. The order complained of was made in the case of Church v. Anti-Kalsomine Co. See 119 Mich. 437. The nature of the action is shown in the opinion of this court in that case when presented to us on demurrer. 118 Mich. 219. After an issue of fact was joined, the plaintiff in the case asked for an order requiring the relator to produce for the inspection of a competent bookkeeper all…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Church v. Anti-Kalsomine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Eddy v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- People ex rel. Germania Fire Insurance v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Petrie v. DickermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Church v. Anti-Kalsomine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by2 opinions
- Preston National Bank v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906