Legal Opinion

Church v. Anti-Kalsomine Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Case by Melvin B. Church against the Anti-Kalsomine Company: On motion to dismiss a writ of certiorari, issued by a commissioner on defendant’s application.

1Per curiam

The court in this case made an order that the defendant produce certain books and papers for *438the examination of plaintiff’s bookkeeper. Defendant applied to the circuit court commissioner to allow the writ of certiorari to this court to review this order. The commissioner allowed the writ. Plaintiff moves to dismiss it.

We think the motion must be granted. Mandamus is the proper remedy. Cummer v. Kent Circuit Judge, 38 Mich. 351; Petrie v. Muskegon Circuit Judge, 90 Mich. 265; Eddy v. Pay Circuit Judge, 114 Mich. 668.

We do not think it was the intention of the legislature to authorize a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Cummer v. Judge of the Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Eddy v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Petrie v. DickermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anti-Kalsomine Co. v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API