Legal Opinion

Eddy v. Bay Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1897PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Mandamus by John F. Eddy and others to compel Andrew C. Maxwell, circuit judge of Bay county, to set aside an order requiring relators to produce certain books and papers for inspection.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Mandamus is sought to compel the vacation of an order requiring relators to produce certain books and papers for the inspection of the attorneys of Edwin T. Bennett in a suit instituted by said Bennett against relators for malicious prosecution. It is contended that, as no rules are now in force relating to the production of books and papers (those formerly in force Cir. Ct. Rules Nos. 40 to 43 having been omitted in the revision), no such right now exists. It is true, there is no statute or rule governing the case, but, at the common law, production of books and papers can be compelled'…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Cummer v. Judge of the Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Preston National Bank v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Anti-Kalsomine Co. v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Church v. Anti-Kalsomine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API