Legal Opinion

People In the Interest of S.T., a Child, and Concerning Q.W

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 2015No. Court of Appeals 14CA2347PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE FURMAN

T1 In this dependency and neglect case, the juvenile court entered an order allocating parental responsibilities (APR order) for S.T. to maternal grandparents. The court entered this order despite father, Q.W., prevailing at the adjudicatory hearing.

T2 On appeal, father challenges the APR order. He contends that the juvenile court had no basis to enter this order because the court's subject matter jurisdiction terminated after he prevailed at the adjudicatory hearing. We agree. We thus vacate the APR order and remand with directions for the court to discharge father and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. People ex rel. A. M. D.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. Danielson v. Castle Meadows, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. People v. SchoondermarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Interest of L.B.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. People in the Interest of S.T., and Concerning Q.WColorado Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API