Legal Opinion

People v. Schoondermark

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 6, 1985No. 84SA99PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRSHBAUM, Justice.

Defendant, Robert Allen Schoondermark, appeals his jury conviction of assault in the second degree under section 18-3-203(l)(f), 8 C.R.S. (1978). 1 Because defendant asserts that this statute violates due process protections guaranteed by the United States and Colorado Constitutions, the appeal has been transferred to this court. See §§ 13-4-102(l)(b), -110(l)(a), 6 C.R.S. (1973). We affirm.

I

On February 27, 1981, at approximately 2:00 a.m., the Fort Collins Police Department received a telephone call from Sharon Podein, reporting unidentified noises in her backyard and at…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. People v. CastroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Kogan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. People v. CzemerynskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. People v. FullerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. People v. NormanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. People v. TippettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API