Legal Opinion

Burroughs v. Whitwam

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1886PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Genesee. (Newton, J.) Trespass. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiffs sued defendant in justice’s court in an action of trespass, alleging in their declaration filed in the cause that the defendant broke and entered their close, described as “ All that land flowed by the mill-pond at high-water mark, on west half of northwest quarter of section 20, town 7, north of range 7 east, in township of Burton, in Genesee county.” The main trespass complained of is the act of the defendant in going on the water of this mill*281pond in a boat and catching fish, which he took and carried away, of the value of two dollars; setting forth also that the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. SanborneMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Thunder Bay River Booming Co. v. SpeechlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Griffith v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Attorney General Ex Rel. Director of Conservation v. TaggartMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Dana v. HurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Gratz v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API