Moore v. Sanborne
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair Circuit. The facts are set forth in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Martin, J.
This was an action on the case, to recover damages for an alleged obstruction of Pine River, claimed to be a public highway. From the case presented, we gather that Pine River is a small stream, emptying into the St. Clair. That from its mouth, to a place called the “Deer *521Licks,” a distance of about six miles, it is navigable at all seasons, for boats, rafts, logs, &c., while above the “deer licks,” and to a point above where the parties used the same, the river was only capable of being used for floatage during the periodical freshets, or at least “not at ordinary…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. PlattNew York Supreme Court · 1819
3Cited by69 opinions
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Sterling v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Collins v. GerhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Giddings v. RogalewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.