Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Holman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1900No. 3494PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. William E. Richardson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Tke opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J.

This action is brought by the respondents to recover of appellant $250 as damages which re*348spondents sustained by reason of the appellant cutting a wire fence on the land of respondents in Spokane county, where such wire crossed the stream known as the “Little Spokane River,” which flows through the land of respondents; and also to recover of the appellant the sum of $250, the value of certain trout fish which appellant caught in said Little Spokane river while in a boat on said river on respondents’ land where said river runs across the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. The MontelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Holyoke Co. v. LymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Trustees of Brookhaven v. . StrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Sterling v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Chenango Bridge Co. v. . PaigeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Harrison v. FiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. State Ex Rel. State Game Commission v. Red River Valley Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Taylor Fishing Club v. HammettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Proctor v. SimWashington Supreme Court · 1925

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API