Dana v. Hurst
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Reno district court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
West, J.:
Plaintiff sued to recover possession of certain land in Reno county, bounded on the north by the Arkansas river. The defendant claimed a portion of the tract under a school-land purchase and on the: theory that it is an island in the bed 'of a navigable’ stream-and therefore subject under chapter 378 of the-*948Laws of 1907 (Gen. Stat. 1909, §8202), to sale as school land. The plaintiff contended that this portion of the tract was an accretion and denied the navigability of the river and the existence of an island. All of these questions were…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- WILLSON AND OTHERS v. the Black Bird Creek Marsh CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State ex rel. Dawson v. AkersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- United States v. Brewer-Elliott Oil & Gas Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1918
- State v. RolioUtah Supreme Court · 1927
- Brewer-Elliott Oil & Gas Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- State v. NolegsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.