Legal Opinion
Conkling v. Keisling
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 27, 1993No. SC S40199Published
1Opinion of the Court
852 P.2d 183 (1993)
316 Or. 390
Gary L. CONKLING, Petitioner,
v.
Phil KEISLING, in his capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Oregon, and Shirley Gold, Cedric Hayden, Don McIntire, Gail Shibley and Barbara Seymour, in their capacities as members of the explanatory committee for Ballot Measure One, Respondents.
SC S40199.
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.
Argued and Submitted May 18, 1993.
Decided May 27, 1993.
James N. Gardner, of Gardner, Cosgrove & Gardner, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the petition was Lynda Nelson Gardner.
Richard D. Wasserman, Asst. Atty. Gen.,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coalition for Equitable School Funding, Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Portland v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- June v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.