Cornell v. Howe
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
REID, C.
This is a suit brought by Eugene Howe, defendant in error, against George A. Cornell, Jr., plaintiff in error, to recover commission as broker in the sale of a tract of land.
The case was tried to the court without a jury, and the plaintiff had judgment, from which the defendant appeals. The parties ■will be referred to as they stood in the trial court.
-The question most seriously urged is that the evidence does not reasonably sustain the finding and the judgment of the trial court. With this condition we are required to review only the evidence sustaining plaintiff’s right of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tyler v. ParrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Roberts v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Scully v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Nation v. HarnessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Birch v. McNaughtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
3Cited by7 opinions
- Artlin Realty Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Kurz v. StaffordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Wagnon v. ShoptawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Johnston v. DillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. StokesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.