Legal Opinion

Wagnon v. Shoptaw

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 31, 1933No. 21481PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews-, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant for the recovery of an amount found due as a commission for the sale of real estate.

The defendant contends that, the judgment is noit sustained by the evidence. Since the defendant did not demur to the evidence, move for an instructed verdict, or otherwise legally attack the sufficiency of the plaintiffs evidence during the trial, the question of the sufficiency of that evidence cannot toe presented on motion for new trial, or in. this court. White v. Hughes, 145 Okla. 192, 292 P. 37.

Whether or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Harris v. OwenbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Cornell v. HoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. White v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Stuart v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shultz v. DillardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Brewer v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Cales v. PattisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Farmers National Bank of Sulphur v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Francis v. ErwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API